|
 |
|
perturbation field
In the following, I want to reflect on the perception
of phenomena and the related cognition. Usually we see events as caused
by a phenomenon and this phenomenon being formed by facts. But it is for
certain that there exist various fields which create these facts. And
it seems that the perturbation fields interact with all these fields.
The fields which exist behind the phenomena are formed by even more microscopic
and more differentiated fields. In a certain sense, a phenomenon is a
warp resulting from a perturbation which comes from an interference of
all these fields.
I think, our cognition of the phenomena is inclined by a separating and
unifying view of the complex interference of these fields. The meaning
of phenomena is reached by deciding for uniqueness. By this, we will achieve
only a limited perception from one point of view. This perspective, depending
just on this one sided vision, will make the phenomena appear to be separate
and unique. Thus our space is dominated by the cognitively perceived environment
consisting of various separated phenomena.
But we could imagine our conceptual view, the cognition of phenomena and
the fields generating these phenomena to be different facts and we could
also imagine that there are interfering facts which are supported by a
different concept. We have to reconsider our points of view, so that we
can connect both concepts. It requires an activity to perceive these fields
which are hidden behind the phenomena. Finally the various separated cognitions
will start to distribute more strongly according to the interferential
concept which is accompanies the shifting of passages. It is important
for us, to transfer our cognition from separativity to distributivity.
I think, it will be possible for us to achieve this distributivity, if
we are able to gain clear perturbations from the phenomena.
In a way, the actual phenomena have purturbed our cognition continuously.
|
|
|